Comments on: A Thought about ThinkGum

By: Alex "Hypno Pants" G.

Alex "Hypno Pants" G. — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:27:10 +0000

Well Jason, while focuset is similar to Think Gum… I also chew gum in general for my A.D.D. … so if I were to buy focuset, I’d get the same effects as Think Gum, but then I’d have to buy more gum Think Gum combines the two.

However, if I had the money, I’d have ritalin, think gum, and focuset daily o.O haha … no seriously, I would.

By: Alx_xlA

Alx_xlA — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:49:30 +0000

Is this, by any chance, affiliated with the company that makes Brain TonIQ? The packages look suspiciously similar.

By: Dr. Pepsi

Dr. Pepsi — Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:07:40 +0000

Good Review!

By: Jake

Jake — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:57:21 +0000

I just bought some of this this gum from 7-11 and thought that the herbal taste after the peppermint taste was really good. Funny about the name talk above, Think Gum sound pretty appropriate to me.

By: Anita

Anita — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:38:18 +0000

I hear that Go Fast is coming out with a gum… I love their energy drink, and can’t wait to try the gum!!!

By: Anon

Anon — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:32:58 +0000

Just to drop a line here. I’ve heard of people replacing caffeine with stay-awake prescription med Modafinil and Armodafinil … check it out on wikipedia (death by moda?).

Cheers.

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:19:33 +0000

I would encourage the reviewer (and anyone else reading this) to check out Focuset. Their website (www.focuset.com) offers a free trial (just remember to call and cancel) and the product works – or you’re out $6.50. It has similar ingredients as the gum featured on this page (guarana and vinpocetine), but also includes other lesser known ingredients which support memory/attention enhancement (rhodiola rosea, nadh, yerba mate, etc…)

By: Dusty

Dusty — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:27:10 +0000

Also, Ipod is a good name because it separates the player from a hoard of other players. The Ipod is not unique in its most basic sense (an MP3 player), so a unique name is warranted. For ThinkGum, though, it’s inherently unique. There is no need to further ostracize itself from the competition with a catchy name.

By: Dusty

Dusty — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:22:56 +0000

Point taken, and I agree with you on Wild ‘N Out. But for ThinkGum, I don’t believe the company is marketing a product as ubiquitous as MP3 players. With the gum’s specific use they can’t afford to market a name that doesn’t directly describe the use of the product, or else they risk falling in with the ranks of all the other gums out there.

By: josh

josh — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:04 +0000

All I’m saying is that the best products generally have original names that don’t overdo it. iPod for instance, isn’t zanny or wacky but also isn’t generic like iPlayMusic4U. Creativity is good, lunacy is not.