Poll: Monster Energy Vs. Vermonster Beer

Image source: Rutland Herald

What is wrong with people?

Monster Energy is strong arming a poor little brewing company in Vermont.

A lawyer contacted Rock Art Brewery with a letter stating the following;

“Stop using “Vermonster” as the name of one your beers because consumers might confuse it with the energy drink.”

Your client’s use…of VERMONSTER in connection with beer will undoubtedly create a likelihood of confusion and/or dilute the distinctive quality of Hansen’s MONSTER marks,” wrote attorney Diane Reed of the California law firm Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear.

Monster just lost some points with me. I can’t believe they would be that petty! What do you think? Participate in the poll below.

Update: Monster has withdrawn its lawsuit against Vermonster!

Does Monster Energy have the right to tell Vermonster Beer to change its name?

  • Monster is becoming just another corporate slime ball! (61%, 187 Votes)
  • No, noway anyone would confuse the two. (54%, 166 Votes)
  • Yes, It is too similar and people will confuse it. (5%, 15 Votes)

Total Voters: 306

Loading ... Loading ...
If you like it, share it..
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
Posted in Energy Drinks · October 15th, 2009

14 Comments

Tim October 15th, 2009 7:01 pm

Monster are full of themselves.

Nick October 15th, 2009 9:12 pm

I don’t think they should have to change it unless Monster can prove it’s hurting their business in some way. I hope Monster doesn’t win this, as much as I love their products. I’ve never even heard of Vermonster till now, and when this case makes news, that’s when it’s really going to hurt them worse than if they just left it alone.

Evan October 16th, 2009 10:47 am

I’ve also never heard of Vermonster, and I’m confuaed about who would ever confuse the names. It’s suprising they have time to harass small companies with all the new drinks thy are making and all the promotion they do lol.

Riley October 16th, 2009 10:19 pm

Wow, they are doing the exact same thing as Monster Cables

Gilly October 17th, 2009 1:41 am

C’mon…let’s be above that, people. Seriously? Energy drink companies are given enough crap to begin with! Monster is just digging themselves a hole.

Tagifras October 17th, 2009 1:40 pm

Wow this is ridiculous

if this is considered copyright then lets name a few more.

Vermonster is also a Ben&Jerry icecream and a 4×4 trail in Vermont

But lets stick with drinks.

Mountain Dew – Mountain Holla, Mountain Breeze, Mountain Fury, Mountain Lighting, Mountain Mojo, Mountain Yeller, Rocky Mist (theres more)

Dr. Pepper – Dr. Topper, Dr. Thunder, Dr. Perky, Dr. Phizz, Dr. Riffic (theres more)

Most the time these are blatent direct ripoffs flatout stealing; image, packaging, color, and taste.

These are also usually located right next to the “big brand” in stores such as Walmart.

Vermonster is in a fucking microbrewery in Vermont. What kind of damage could it possibly be doing.

Subway October 17th, 2009 6:04 pm

This is worse than the Volt vs. Vault suit of last September… *groan*

Santino October 18th, 2009 8:29 am

Ben and Jerry’s Vermonster has been around a bit longer than Monster energy drink.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermonster

paula October 19th, 2009 9:37 am

corporate america is after our small business, also. We’ve been using the name Oil Zone since 1996 for our two oil cnange shops. In 2003 a national retail parts store, Autozone, sued us. We won summary judgment. Autozone appealed. Case is going to trail Nov. 2, 2009. Corporate strategy is definitely to keep this in the courts, so cost will drain the little guy. Corporate giants depend on winning with their resources. They’ll take a win regardless of principle.

Mornelithe October 20th, 2009 10:01 am

Ben & Jerry’s has used to term Vermonster for their legendary Ice Cream Sunday for more than 20 years now. I fail to see how Monster, Inc. will have any legs to stand on given the phrases use in Vermont, for longer than the company’s been making energy drinks.

ted October 20th, 2009 12:57 pm

That’s true legally, but Monster has big bucks so they can drag it out in court which can be too expensive for small companies so they are forced to give in…..sad, really

Jayakumar October 22nd, 2009 2:58 pm

If they are doing business legally then Monster should not step them. Because all the human being must have their own rights to live in the world as well as rights to do the legal business in the world.

Clay October 22nd, 2009 3:49 pm

The person who wrote the article we are commenting on obviously doesn’t know Vermont. We have many intra-state items named the Vermonster. It is a name long equated with the state. We use it to name big sundaes and other creations uniquely from Vermont.

We couldn’t care less about Monster or copying it.

Anything named Vermonster is Vermont!

Jen October 26th, 2009 4:58 am

So typical of big companies!! I’m sick of larger corporations bullying small businesses for their own profit. I’ll make sure to tell everyone I know NOT to purchase any more Monster products. Additionally, I’m never buying anything made by them again.

Especially in this economy, you’d think companies would really consider these types of moves prior to making them. Also, shame on lawyers who represent these larger companies for their own profit.

Add Comment


Copyright 2005-2010 Energyfiend.com