<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Senate Proposes an Energy Drink Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s largest database of caffeine amounts, caffeine positives and negatives, energy drink pros, cons, and reviews..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-157374</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-157374</guid>
		<description>I actually thought about this -- it&#039;s not a bad idea at all when you look at the numbers behind some of the products on the shelves. 

I wrote about this in a recent blog of mine:

Taxes: From Cigarettes to Caffeine

http://mikebeach.org/2010/07/taxes-from-cigarettes-to-caffeine/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought about this &#8212; it&#8217;s not a bad idea at all when you look at the numbers behind some of the products on the shelves. </p>
<p>I wrote about this in a recent blog of mine:</p>
<p>Taxes: From Cigarettes to Caffeine</p>
<p><a href="http://mikebeach.org/2010/07/taxes-from-cigarettes-to-caffeine/" rel="nofollow">http://mikebeach.org/2010/07/taxes-from-cigarettes-to-caffeine/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexa</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-153263</link>
		<dc:creator>alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-153263</guid>
		<description>dont be mean to us the ones who like them u should put like taxes to furniture or something else but not energy drinks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont be mean to us the ones who like them u should put like taxes to furniture or something else but not energy drinks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexa</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-153262</link>
		<dc:creator>alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-153262</guid>
		<description>i love energy drinks they shouldnt charge nasty taxes i drink them like every day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love energy drinks they shouldnt charge nasty taxes i drink them like every day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-153252</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-153252</guid>
		<description>Move to Australia. we wont tax your energy drinks   xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move to Australia. we wont tax your energy drinks   xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doody</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152953</link>
		<dc:creator>doody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152953</guid>
		<description>the last thing we need is another health-related tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the last thing we need is another health-related tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvind Leo Pereira</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152858</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvind Leo Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152858</guid>
		<description>All beverages are anyways taxed right, does this mean there will be double taxation? 
a seperate tax variety? 

How many ppl number of people drink coffee on the way to office in the US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All beverages are anyways taxed right, does this mean there will be double taxation?<br />
a seperate tax variety? </p>
<p>How many ppl number of people drink coffee on the way to office in the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bello</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152820</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152820</guid>
		<description>If they don&#039;t like cigarettes why do they allow them to be sold?  Good thing they take advantage of the poor addicted people by taxing the shit out of them.  That way they will know they are wasting their money and won&#039;t buy them anymore.  They could easily eliminate all use by raising the required age each year, but they make way to much money off them for that.

And if they believe in freedom of choice like they say, why can&#039;t American kids buy cigs?  Make their own life choices like the government promised them.

The government is contradictory every step of the way, and only when it&#039;s own interests are at stake.  It&#039;s interests claim to be for the people but that&#039;s just not always true. (I don&#039;t smoke, nor do i fight or support it.  I do not like Obama, I do not like Macain, I am not labeling myself as a democrat or a republican.

Support the people!

 What ever happened to the constitution? Bring back Strict interpretation please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they don&#8217;t like cigarettes why do they allow them to be sold?  Good thing they take advantage of the poor addicted people by taxing the shit out of them.  That way they will know they are wasting their money and won&#8217;t buy them anymore.  They could easily eliminate all use by raising the required age each year, but they make way to much money off them for that.</p>
<p>And if they believe in freedom of choice like they say, why can&#8217;t American kids buy cigs?  Make their own life choices like the government promised them.</p>
<p>The government is contradictory every step of the way, and only when it&#8217;s own interests are at stake.  It&#8217;s interests claim to be for the people but that&#8217;s just not always true. (I don&#8217;t smoke, nor do i fight or support it.  I do not like Obama, I do not like Macain, I am not labeling myself as a democrat or a republican.</p>
<p>Support the people!</p>
<p> What ever happened to the constitution? Bring back Strict interpretation please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilly</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152789</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152789</guid>
		<description>Wow! I page down and all I can see is Ben...Ben...Ben.   : )   I agree with your first post though. And...your second. Don&#039;t worry. Whenever i post a smiley face, it holds my post too. It&#039;s no biggie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I page down and all I can see is Ben&#8230;Ben&#8230;Ben.   : )   I agree with your first post though. And&#8230;your second. Don&#8217;t worry. Whenever i post a smiley face, it holds my post too. It&#8217;s no biggie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152783</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152783</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Ben that is strange, we use a plug in that filters comments...Maybe the plugin was made by the Bush Administration..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Ben that is strange, we use a plug in that filters comments&#8230;Maybe the plugin was made by the Bush Administration&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.energyfiend.com/us-senate-proposes-an-energy-drink-tax/comment-page-2#comment-152779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyfiend.com/?p=1786#comment-152779</guid>
		<description>Hey, just heard you responded. The issue was if a certain word previously mentioned is entered it is held. Personally I don&#039;t drink much of that, tastes like chemical. And, I agree no government conspiracy, why would they care? Just wondering why your blocking political words in a political thread. So I guess my question of why still stands, it&#039;s not about how long but why selective blocking. Wasn&#039;t like I said anything foul or off color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just heard you responded. The issue was if a certain word previously mentioned is entered it is held. Personally I don&#8217;t drink much of that, tastes like chemical. And, I agree no government conspiracy, why would they care? Just wondering why your blocking political words in a political thread. So I guess my question of why still stands, it&#8217;s not about how long but why selective blocking. Wasn&#8217;t like I said anything foul or off color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

